SRA Risk Outlook 2020/2021
The SRA have published their risk outlook for 2020/2021. The outlook considers the market landscape and the effects of Covid-19 and Brexit, primarily the economic impact;
- The SRA priority risks for 2020/2021 are:
- AML:
- Highlighting property work, commercial work and client accounts as highest risks;
- For property an increasing risk around people pretending to own properties owned by more vulnerable people
- NEW: Updated AML Guidance has now been published: https://www.lawsociety.org.uk/topics/anti-money-laundering/anti-money-laundering-guidance
- Client money ie do not steal it!
- Diversity in the profession
- Information and cyber security:
- For homeworking keen to ensure wifi connections are secure and a VPN is a good way to achieve this;
- Note a case study whereby an email from a client had a malicious link which when clicked on sent emails to all of contacts with more malicious attacks. Be very wary of suspicious links;
- Note a case study whereby a solicitor spotted a hack because their emails were appearing out of time order and with a delay.
- Integrity and ethics including pursuing unarguable points of law and compromising independence by failing to guide clients on unusually restrictive terms entered into with a third party referral company;
- Meeting legal needs
- Standards of service, the SRA has raised concerns particularly in respect of high volume claims work. It also more broadly is asking firms to reflect on their quality assurance processes, so do the review the quality of the work on files, are realistic time and costs estimates being provided, is feedback sought, can the firm still operate when staff are unwell, is there a ‘no blame’ learning culture.
SRA cracking down on registration under Money Laundering Regulations for ‘tax advice’: essentially they are guiding that if a firm tailors advice in any way to a client about their individual tax position then the firm should be registered for this purpose under the Money Laundering Regulations
Legal Ombudsman Annual Complaints review
- LeO have published their annual complaints review for 2019-2020
- LeO found unreasonable service in 51% of concluded cases.
- Residential conveyancing attracts the most complaints (28%), followed by PI (15%), wills & probate (13%), family (13%) then litigation (9%).
- Delay, failure to progress, and poor communication are at the heart of the majority of complaints received.
- 25% of first tier complaint handling were found to be inadequate. Leo wants to see simpler language in complaints handling and a willingness to accept fault where something has gone wrong;
- Outlines sector specific complaints, new trends and best practice/useful resources.
- AML:
Solicitors Qualifying Examination (SQE) to confirmed come into force on 1 September 2021
- SRA have published SQE guidance qualifying work experience
- Also warning that SRA will sanction firms that exploit SQE graduates
- SRA COLP COFA Virtual Conference 2020
- This year’s topics include AML, Cybercrime, Accounts Rules, SQE, Innovation & Technology and common compliance issues.
- 9 videos available to watch on Youtube. Not a requirement to watch but may be useful and can count towards maintaining competence.
- SRA Accounts Rules
- SRA have released guidance on how they make decisions to grant authorisation to a firm to withdraw amounts over £500 from client accounts – rule 5.1(c) of the Accounts Rules.
- Requests must be made in writing with evidence of the “adequate” steps already taken to locate the client
- Outlines relevant factors that will be taken into consideration and three instances where SRA are unable to authorise a withdrawal (dissolved companies, estate matters and out of pocket expenses).
- The SRA have muddied the waters somewhat with new guidance about billing for work which has not yet been done. In light of the confusion it seems prudent to stick to the old approach as closely as possible ie only bill when something has been incurred, which could include fixed fees;
- SRA have released guidance on how they make decisions to grant authorisation to a firm to withdraw amounts over £500 from client accounts – rule 5.1(c) of the Accounts Rules.
- Recent cases of interest which were noted:
- Solicitor handling six-figure international transactions with no experience of ever having done so has been suspended indefinitely for a money laundering breach.
- Solicitor struck off after telling new firm she had a clean slate when she was under investigation;
- Solicitor ordered secretaries to retrospectively “witness” wills struck off;
- Tribunal “right” to disbar barrister over misconduct in case involving own children;
- Solicitor agrees to end 42-year career after multiple rule breaches;
- SRA have published SQE guidance qualifying work experience
- Also warning that SRA will sanction firms that exploit SQE graduates
- SRA COLP COFA Virtual Conference 2020
- This year’s topics include AML, Cybercrime, Accounts Rules, SQE, Innovation & Technology and common compliance issues.
- 9 videos available to watch on Youtube. Not a requirement to watch but may be useful and can count towards maintaining competence.
- SRA Accounts Rules
- SRA have released guidance on how they make decisions to grant authorisation to a firm to withdraw amounts over £500 from client accounts – rule 5.1(c) of the Accounts Rules.
- Requests must be made in writing with evidence of the “adequate” steps already taken to locate the client
- Outlines relevant factors that will be taken into consideration and three instances where SRA are unable to authorise a withdrawal (dissolved companies, estate matters and out of pocket expenses).
- The SRA have muddied the waters somewhat with new guidance about billing for work which has not yet been done. In light of the confusion it seems prudent to stick to the old approach as closely as possible ie only bill when something has been incurred, which could include fixed fees;
- SRA have released guidance on how they make decisions to grant authorisation to a firm to withdraw amounts over £500 from client accounts – rule 5.1(c) of the Accounts Rules.
- Recent cases of interest which were noted:
- NEW: A solicitor who implied that criminal proceedings may follow if the opponent proceed to testify against their client has been banned from working in law firms for a lack of integrity. The concern was that she had attempted to prevent the Court from hearing evidence in an improper manner;
- NEW: Two partners have been fined for charging clients a separate fee for their professional indemnity insurance as if it were a disbursement rather than an overhead of the firm. The partners were also criticised for charging varying fees for completion fo a very simple form;
- NEW: A barrister has made national press and been condemned by an MP for tweeting “The Equality Act undermines school discipline by empowering the stroppy teenager of colour”. He appears to be standing by his remarks. Whether disciplinary action will follow is not clear but this is certainly a disaster professional regardless;
- NEW: An experienced solicitor whose “reckless mismanagement” of her law firm’s finances damaged the profession’s reputation has been struck off. https://www.legalfutures.co.uk/latest-news/solicitors-mismanagement-combined-with-cofas-incompetence
- Lawrence McCullagh was suspended indefinitely for lying to his employer about previous disciplinary findings
https://www.solicitorstribunal.org.uk/sites/default/files-sdt/11683.2017.McCullagh.pdf?mc_cid=89dcdf7e80&mc_eid=e39e625a0a - Catherine Limbert was struck off after telling new firm she had a clean slate when she was under investigation.Both Rizwana Jamil and Gary Burns were struck of for making dishonest statements to their respective clients about the progression of cases and placing the blame on support staff. https://www.lawgazette.co.uk/news/solicitor-who-blamed-support-staff-for-his-own-failures-struck-off/5107270.article https://www.lawgazette.co.uk/news/solicitor-blamed-paralegal-as-immigration-client-misled-for-years/5107244.articleNEW: There have been a number of cases leading to solicitors being struck off or suspended indefinitely for making dishonest statements:
-
- Ramachandren Narayanasamy was struck off for lying to the court. https://www.solicitorstribunal.org.uk/sites/default/files-sdt/11893.2018.Narayanasamy.pdf?mc_cid=89dcdf7e80&mc_eid=e39e625a0a
- NEW: Edward Bennett received a rebuke after being cautioned by the Police for an assault on a family member. https://www.lawgazette.co.uk/news/solicitor-rebuked-after-police-caution-for-assault-at-home/5107346.article
- Solicitor handling six-figure international transactions with no experience of ever having done so has been suspended indefinitely for a money laundering breach.
- Solicitor struck off after telling new firm she had a clean slate when she was under investigation;
- Solicitor ordered secretaries to retrospectively “witness” wills struck off;
- Tribunal “right” to disbar barrister over misconduct in case involving own children;
- Solicitor agrees to end 42-year career after multiple rule breaches;
Important information about these updates
The copyright in this material belongs to the Compliance Office Ltd, a limited company, company no. 09133668, registered office: The Bristol Office, 2nd Floor 5 High Street, Westbury on Trym, Bristol, United Kingdom, BS9 3BY. You may not distribute or commercially exploit the content and you may not transmit it or store it in any other website or similar system. The Compliance Office Ltd and its authors do not offer solicitor or legal services, are not a law firm and do not provide legal advice. This material is general in nature and is intended to assist the reader by drawing some relevant regulatory provisions to his or her attention. The material is not exhaustive and is not a substitute for considering the relevant provisions directly or for legal advice on an individual’s specific circumstances. In particular, it does not include every new rule change, decision, deadline, guidance or other material which may be relevant to you. While care is taken to ensure the complete accuracy of the information as at the date of publication, this cannot be guaranteed. The Compliance Office Ltd, its author(s) and administrators will not be liable for any loss or damage of any nature arising from the use of this material and such liability is excluded to the fullest extent permitted by law.